2018 SEC Exam Priorities: What You Need to Know

On February 7, 2018, the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (“OCIE”) released its Examination Priorities for 2018. This is the sixth year that OCIE staff has issued their priorities, which provide transparency into their thinking and guidance for advisers reviewing their compliance programs. The priorities are organized around five themes: protecting retail investors, critical market infrastructure, self-regulatory organizations, cybersecurity and anti-money laundering. These priorities are consistent with those expressed in prior years. It’s also worth noting that OCIE’s scope of oversight covers investment advisers, investment companies and broker-dealers and many of the themes overlap between those types of organizations.

The largest portion of the document, and that of most interest to advisers, was devoted to the protection of retail investors, including seniors and those saving for retirement. SEC Chairman Jay Clayton has emphasized the Commission’s commitment to protecting everyday investors, and the exam priorities reflect this mission. Several priorities were identified, including:

  • Disclosure of the costs of investing. Examiners will review the disclosure of fees charged and other compensation the financial professional may receive; conflicts of interest that may provide incentives for certain products or services; and whether fees and expenses are calculated and charged as disclosed. OCIE will focus on firms with conditions that may present increased risks that investors will pay inadequately disclosed fees, expenses or other charges, such as incentives related to higher fee mutual fund share classes or accounts that have changed from commission-based to asset-based fees.
  • Electronic Investment Advice. OCIE will continue to examine firms that offer advice through automated platforms, including “robo-advisers.” Examinations will focus on compliance programs, including oversight of computer program algorithms that generate recommendations, as well as marketing materials, conflict of interest disclosure and data protection.
  • Wrap Fee Programs. Examiners will review whether the recommendation to invest in a wrap fee program is reasonable, if conflicts of interest are disclosed and whether advisers are receiving best execution and disclosing costs associated with trading through another broker-dealer.
  • Senior Investors and Retirement Accounts. Examinations will continue to focus on investment recommendations, sales of variable insurance products and the use of target date funds. In addition, examiners will review how broker-dealers oversee interactions with senior investors, including the ability of firms to identify exploitation of seniors.
  • Mutual Funds and Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). As a new initiative this year, OCIE intends to conduct examinations focusing on mutual funds that have experienced poor performance or liquidity of subscriptions and redemptions relative to their peer groups, are managed by advisers with little experience managing registered investment companies or that hold securities that are potentially difficult to value during times of market stress. Examiners will also focus on ETFs that have little secondary market trading volume and face the risk of being de-listed from an exchange, and funds and ETFs that track custom indexes for conflicts with the index provider.
  • Fixed Income Order Execution. Examinations will assess whether broker-dealers have implemented best execution policies and procedures.
  • Cryptocurrency, Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), Secondary Market Trading and Blockchain. The cryptocurrency and ICO markets have grown rapidly and present risks for retail investors. Where such products are securities, examiners will focus on controls to protect assets from theft or misappropriation and whether investors receive disclosure about the risks associated with these investments. In light of recent guidance and media attention on this subject, we are not surprised by OCIE’s focus.
  • Never-Before-Examined Advisers. OCIE will continue to identify and examine firms that have never been examined.

Among the other themes, the priorities most relevant to investment advisers and broker-dealers are cybersecurity and anti-money laundering, specifically:

  • Examiners will continue to prioritize cybersecurity controls in exams focusing on governance, risk assessments, access controls, data loss prevention, vendor management, training and incident response.
  • Anti-Money Laundering (AML). As broker-dealers and investment companies are subject to AML rules, examinations of those entities will review the adequacy of AML programs, including customer due diligence, SAR filings, and robust and timely independent tests of programs.

In view of the SEC’s examination priorities, now is a good time to focus on any priorities identified impacting your firm’s business model and to consider revisiting your firm’s annual review content and written policies and procedures (“WSPs”) to ensure that the applicable SEC priorities are being addressed. For example, as part of this process, review those WSP sections for any material gaps and then test to ensure that the policies are being adhered to.


For more help with your compliance program, contact Ascendant at 860-435-2255.

Related Content

Latest Content

Takeaways and Tips Related to SEC Risk Alert on Regulation S-P

On April 16, 2019, the SEC released a Risk Alert providing a list of compliance issues related to Regulation S-P, the primary SEC rule regarding privacy notices and safeguard policies of investment advisers and broker-dealers. As with other risk alerts, these were deficiencies noted by OCIE in regulatory examinations. Though the deficiencies were fairly common … Continued

How to Be a Wildly Effective Compliance Officer

Being a Compliance Officer is no easy task. Administering a compliance program, implementing controls to help protect clients and the firm, and staying on top of new regulations is only part of the job. Compliance Officers are also expected to be flexible and pro-business. So how do you do it all? How can you be … Continued

Mitigating the Risk of Insider Trading

One of the biggest risks affecting investment advisers is the potential that material non-public information (“MNPI”) may be misused, leading to a charge of insider trading. Advisers should implement controls to mitigate these risks. Steven Stone of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP, Salvatore Cincinelli of the FBI and David Chaves of Tone at the Top … Continued

Compliance 2.0 – Being a Strategic Partner in Your Firm

Compliance as a profession continues to evolve. With Enron, Bernie Madoff and numerous other failures paving the way for rulemaking across industries and nations, the days of drawing a short straw, getting drafted into a compliance role and operating in isolation outside of the business are – or should be – ancient history. Since the … Continued

Big Data Part III: Preparing for the Future of Global Regulatory Governance

United States and European Union reporting requirements imposed on investment managers have exploded since the Global Financial Crisis and, with the imminent arrival of SFTR in Europe, it seems poised to expand again. The challenge of reporting trades, transactions and contracts in multiple jurisdictions requires firms to embrace technology as regulators continue to look to … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.