Best Practice Tips for the Use of Expert Networks in Investment Research

In general, an expert network platform facilitates the exchange of information between “experts” and investment professionals. Unfortunately, certain industry participants have misused expert networks, and in many insider trading cases, the analysts sought to cultivate relationships with experts outside of a structured platform.

At the recent Ascendant Compliance Management Conference “Compliance Disruptors: Seismic Shifts of the Regulatory Landscape” held in Napa, California, we discussed best practices for leveraging expert networks, political intelligence agencies, and direct paid consultants in the investment research process.

The following were the key takeaways provided by panelists Laurence Herman of Gerson Lehman Group, Jonathan Streeter of Dechert LLP, and Samantha Addonizio of Ascendant:

  • Develop compliance policies, procedures and controls that:

1) are separate from those provided by the platform;
2) are tailored to the specific risks of the information source; and
3) address how the Firm intends to monitor the activities of the experts on the platform or direct paid consultants.

  • Do not speak to experts that are current employees of a public company. Use the six-month rule!
  • Government employees should be subjected to the same compliance controls as “experts.” Government information can be just as sensitive and the SEC is currently focused on political intelligence agencies.
  • When speaking to direct paid consultants, verify and document the source of the information being exchanged. Require the consultant to sign an acknowledgement of compliance.
  • Monitor your analysts’ social networks (both online and offline). Do they have connections to officers at public companies on LinkedIn, Facebook, or Twitter? Is the portfolio invested in any of those companies?
  • If speaking to former officers at public companies, research whether they have ever had issues with Regulation FD.
  • Require employees to obtain pre-approval to schedule a call. Maintain a log of when calls occurred, and what individual securities and/or sectors were discussed.
  • Ask analysts to prepare notes of each consultation to provide to compliance for review!

Related Content

Latest Content

How Do You Supervise for SEC Pay-to-Play Violations?

If you wanted more information about the contours of the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule, or how the SEC may enforce it, three recent Settlement Orders against large investment advisers for “over de minimis” political contributions provide some insight regarding one of the prohibitions: Contributions by Covered Associates to certain Government Officials over the specified Exception amount (capitalized words are terms in the … Continued

Do your Fund Documents Clearly Disclose Receipt of Accelerated Monitoring Fees?

Somewhat more reminiscent of the broken-windows enforcement era, two affiliated private equity advisers managing billions settled with the SEC on charges that they failed to make pre-commitment disclosures in fund governing documents related to accelerated fees received from portfolio companies. Interestingly, according to the Settlement Order, the advisers had made some disclosures in fund documents … Continued

With New Risk Alert, SEC Doubles Down on Best Execution

On July 11, 2018, the SEC issued a Risk Alert outlining commonly found compliance issues related to best execution by investment advisers. Advisers have an obligation to seek best execution of client transactions, taking into consideration quantitative factors such as execution quality and commission rate, as well as more qualitative factors such as the value … Continued

The Cost of Compliance: Understanding and Leveraging Resources

For compliance officers, obtaining the necessary tools and resources to build an effective compliance program can be costly and difficult to implement. How do you distinguish the best in class, the most cost-efficient and effective for use in your program? In this ComplianceCast, speakers David Porteous of Faegre Baker Daniels and Korrine Kohm of Ascendant … Continued

California Privacy Law Brings GDPR-Lite to the U.S.

New Act Will Give Consumers Rights to Access and Delete Their Data In what has become an ongoing race among states to have the toughest privacy regulation in the U.S., California has jumped to the front. On June 28, 2018, California’s legislature unanimously passed a privacy bill that was later signed by Governor Jerry Brown, … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.