Colorado Joins New York in Mandating Cybersecurity Controls for Financial Institutions

On the heels of the recently adopted New York State Department of Financial Services Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR 500), Colorado has followed suit with its own set of protections. The Colorado Division of Securities has issued cybersecurity regulations applicable to broker dealers and investment advisers registered with the state, which are codified in Sections 51-4.8 and 51-4.14(IA), respectively.,

Section 51-4.14(IA) requires covered entities to establish and maintain written cybersecurity procedures reasonably designed to ensure cybersecurity. The “reasonableness” standard appears to be a sliding scale, taking into account factors such as:

  1. the firm’s size;
  2. third party vendors;
  3. the extent of the firm’s cyber policies, procedures, and training;
  4. the firm’s use of electronic communications;
  5. auto-lock controls for devices with access to Confidential Personal Information; and
  6. the firm’s process for reporting of lost or stolen devices

Factors 5 and 6 appear to be concerned with mobile devices.

The Colorado cybersecurity regulation requires two things:

  1. Cybersecurity included as part of the adviser’s risk assessment; and
  2. Written cybersecurity policies and procedures which are reasonably designed, with “reasonableness” judged on the foregoing factors, and addressing the following:
  • Annual cybersecurity risk assessment of potential risks and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of Confidential Personal Information
  • Use of Secure Email containing Confidential PI
  • Authentication practices for employee access to electronic communications, databases, and media
  • Procedures for authenticating client instructions received electronically (e.g. addressing the risk of wire fraud and identity theft); and
  • Disclosure to clients of the risks of using electronic communications

Colorado defines “Confidential Personal Information” to include a first name or first initial and last name, in combination with one or more items such as a social security number; driver’s license number or ID card number; account number plus security code/access code/password to gain access to the account; an individual’s digital or electronic signature, or user name / unique ID / email address plus password, access code, security questions or other authentication that would permit access to the account.

The Colorado cybersecurity regulations were adopted by the Colorado Division of Securities on May 19, 2017 and formally approved by the Colorado Attorney General on June 7, 2017. The regulations became effective July 15, 2017.

Ascendant has designed an offering which includes cybersecurity procedures, cybersecurity training, and cybersecurity testing specifically for firms impacted by the Colorado cybersecurity regulation. To learn more, contact us at info@ascendantcompliance.com.

Related Content

Latest Content

Insurance Considerations for Investment Advisers

How much coverage is enough? What types of insurance policies do you need? Whether you are starting an investment advisory practice, launching a new line of business, or reevaluating your existing risks, there are critical questions to ask to make sure you understand the various ways to protect your firm. Join us for a practical … Continued

Fifth Circuit Weighs In on DOL Fiduciary Rule

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has vacated the Department of Labor’s Fiduciary Rule. In a 2-1 split, the Fifth Circuit’s decision overrules a Dallas District Court’s decision, which had previously upheld the rule. Unfortunately, the decision does little to settle the fate of the beleaguered rule. Although it … Continued

SEC Proposes Amending Investment Company Liquidity Disclosures in Forms N-PORT and N-1A

On March 14, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) proposed amendments to the mutual fund liquidity-related disclosure requirements. Specifically, the proposal: Adds a new requirement to “briefly discuss the operation and effectiveness of the Fund’s liquidity risk management program during the most recently completed fiscal year” in the Fund’s Management Discussion of Fund Performance … Continued

Paradigm Shift in SEC Exams, Benefits of a Mock Exam

For investment advisers currently going through an SEC exam, the process likely bears little resemblance to exams of old. Call it the new normal, a paradigm shift, or simply the effects of the SEC having to do more with less, but anecdotal evidence among those now experiencing the exam process suggests some interesting new trends. … Continued

Why Should a Big Hedge Fund Use a Compliance Consultant?

If your firm isn’t already using an outside consultant, you may want to ask yourself “why not?” Oftentimes at hedge funds, compliance officers struggle to successfully fulfill the requirements of the job without an essential tool in their toolbox: the outside compliance consultant. Why? The primary reason is simple: resources. When your head is down … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.