Compliance Points for Insider Trading, MNPI

The news headlines continue to be filled with insider trading scandals. Insider trading is based on a simple, well-established principle: if you receive material, nonpublic information about a public company from any source, you are prohibited from discussing or acting on that information.

Under the Advisers Act, the SEC may sue any person (or any person who controls or supervises such person) who trades while in possession of “material, nonpublic information” or who communicates or “tips” such information. Trading the securities of any company while in possession of material, nonpublic information about that company is generally prohibited by the securities laws of the United States and firm policy. Under insider trading laws, a person or company that illegally trades in securities of a company while in possession of material, nonpublic information about that company may be subject to severe sanctions, including civil penalties, fines and imprisonment.

Please refer to your Code of Ethics and Compliance Policies and Procedures Manual, along with the SEC for additional information on who is an insider and what is considered material, nonpublic information.

Here are some ways to identify sources of insider information:

  • Employees must report all business, financial or personal relationships that may result in access to material, nonpublic information;
  • The CCO should review all reportable personal investment activity for Supervised Persons and related accounts;
  • The CCO should periodically review firm trading activity (e.g., trade blotter review); and
  • The CCO should prepare a written report to management and/or legal counsel, as necessary, of any possible violation of the firm’s Insider Trading Policy for the purpose of implementing corrective and/or disciplinary action.

During routine e-mail surveillance, review communications to identify any wrongdoing or sharing of non-public information. In addition, conduct a review of the Firm’s trade blotter and document any anomalies in clients’ trading.

SEC enforcement actions demonstrate that persons with no intention of receiving MNPI may have relationships with the potential to lead to the sharing of MNPI, and that some persons attempt to take advantage of the information. A cursory search of “insider trading” results will include recent cases in which accountants, investor relations personnel, auditors, and investment representatives have shared MNPI.

Insider Trading Compliance Points:
  1. Your Code of Ethics may require reporting of Supervised Persons’ positions on the board of directors of a public company or other governing board of a public company. Such service with a public company could subject a person to inside information and therefore restrict such employee’s ability to trade such security or securities.
  2. The compliance reporting requirement and compliance reviews of personal securities transactions are, in part, designed to detect personal trading based on inside information.
  3. The portfolio holdings of client accounts and trading activity within such accounts are considered inside information by the Firm.
  4. Supervised Persons should be aware that inside information about public companies may be acquired from a broad range of sources, potentially including clients, accounting-firm clients or brokers with which the firm conducts securities activities. Supervised persons should be cognizant that it should not act on any third-party information that it believes may be inside information regardless of the source of such information.

Compliance Training Tip: Now is a great time to provide employees with additional training on what constitutes insider trading and the potential repercussions of acting on such information. Even an email communication to employees highlighting this section of the Code of Ethics can bring awareness of the topic to the forefront. We have also provided a link to download a ComplianceCast presentation on the topic of insider trading that you might find helpful.

Related Content

Latest Content

When Policies, Procedures and Testing Protocols Aren’t Enough…

The Compliance Program Rule continues to be a powerful tool for SEC enforcement, recently used by the SEC to address trading away in wrap accounts, misappropriation of retail client assets, and the misuse of an omnibus account. Advisory firms had written policies and procedures and testing protocols, but they were not good enough; are yours? … Continued

The Compliance Professionals Guide to Effective Trade Desk Monitoring

Global regulators continue to enhance their ability to monitor the activities of market participants through a combination of new rules, filing requirements, and upgrades to surveillance technologies. As a result, many market participants, including both buy-and sell-side firms, need to re-assess how they currently monitor the trading desk, and whether new policies and procedures are … Continued

How Do You Supervise for SEC Pay-to-Play Violations?

If you wanted more information about the contours of the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule, or how the SEC may enforce it, three recent Settlement Orders against large investment advisers for “over de minimis” political contributions provide some insight regarding one of the prohibitions: Contributions by Covered Associates to certain Government Officials over the specified Exception amount (capitalized words are terms in the … Continued

Do your Fund Documents Clearly Disclose Receipt of Accelerated Monitoring Fees?

Somewhat more reminiscent of the broken-windows enforcement era, two affiliated private equity advisers managing billions settled with the SEC on charges that they failed to make pre-commitment disclosures in fund governing documents related to accelerated fees received from portfolio companies. Interestingly, according to the Settlement Order, the advisers had made some disclosures in fund documents … Continued

With New Risk Alert, SEC Doubles Down on Best Execution

On July 11, 2018, the SEC issued a Risk Alert outlining commonly found compliance issues related to best execution by investment advisers. Advisers have an obligation to seek best execution of client transactions, taking into consideration quantitative factors such as execution quality and commission rate, as well as more qualitative factors such as the value … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.