Cybersecurity & 2017 SEC Exam Priorities

In September 2015, the SEC announced it was starting Phase 2 Cybersecurity Exam Initiative exams in which the SEC started doing more in-depth testing of policies, procedures and controls at firms. For example: testing a firm’s access provisioning policy by standing over the shoulder of various employees to confirm whether they could or couldn’t access certain files and folders on the network.

In January 2016, the SEC’s Exam Priorities announced a continuation of the Phase 2 exams.

Now in January 2017, it appears that Phase 2 is over, and this more in-depth testing has found its way into SEC examinations in general.

Granted, some exams might not focus on cybersecurity at all, but the ones that do are likely to now include a more in-depth examination of it, and the SEC will be looking to corroborate that you are doing what your policies say you are doing, and that you have policies on things they expect you to have policies on when it comes to cyber.

At the upcoming Ascendant Compliance Management conference, “Revolutionizing Compliance: The Matrix of Regulation, Operations & Technology,” we will be covering things on the SEC’s cybersecurity request list – what documentation they expect, what types of controls they expect, what policies they expect; how to test various policies ahead of time; ways to improve your firm’s training and security awareness program – since some firms are being called out for inadequate cyber training and since the SEC is using the benefit of hindsight to fine firms that have a cyber incident that comes to light during an exam.

Translation: more training reduces the likelihood of a cyber incident in the first place.

If you need to gain a deeper understanding of the SEC’s views of cybersecurity and how it might affect your firm, join us in Naples on April 3-5. For more information, read our agenda by clicking here.

Related Content

Latest Content

When Policies, Procedures and Testing Protocols Aren’t Enough…

The Compliance Program Rule continues to be a powerful tool for SEC enforcement, recently used by the SEC to address trading away in wrap accounts, misappropriation of retail client assets, and the misuse of an omnibus account. Advisory firms had written policies and procedures and testing protocols, but they were not good enough; are yours? … Continued

The Compliance Professionals Guide to Effective Trade Desk Monitoring

Global regulators continue to enhance their ability to monitor the activities of market participants through a combination of new rules, filing requirements, and upgrades to surveillance technologies. As a result, many market participants, including both buy-and sell-side firms, need to re-assess how they currently monitor the trading desk, and whether new policies and procedures are … Continued

How Do You Supervise for SEC Pay-to-Play Violations?

If you wanted more information about the contours of the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule, or how the SEC may enforce it, three recent Settlement Orders against large investment advisers for “over de minimis” political contributions provide some insight regarding one of the prohibitions: Contributions by Covered Associates to certain Government Officials over the specified Exception amount (capitalized words are terms in the … Continued

Do your Fund Documents Clearly Disclose Receipt of Accelerated Monitoring Fees?

Somewhat more reminiscent of the broken-windows enforcement era, two affiliated private equity advisers managing billions settled with the SEC on charges that they failed to make pre-commitment disclosures in fund governing documents related to accelerated fees received from portfolio companies. Interestingly, according to the Settlement Order, the advisers had made some disclosures in fund documents … Continued

With New Risk Alert, SEC Doubles Down on Best Execution

On July 11, 2018, the SEC issued a Risk Alert outlining commonly found compliance issues related to best execution by investment advisers. Advisers have an obligation to seek best execution of client transactions, taking into consideration quantitative factors such as execution quality and commission rate, as well as more qualitative factors such as the value … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.