Do your Fund Documents Clearly Disclose Receipt of Accelerated Monitoring Fees?

Somewhat more reminiscent of the broken-windows enforcement era, two affiliated private equity advisers managing billions settled with the SEC on charges that they failed to make pre-commitment disclosures in fund governing documents related to accelerated fees received from portfolio companies.

Interestingly, according to the Settlement Order, the advisers had made some disclosures in fund documents about receipt of fees from portfolio companies; they had provided semi-annual financial reports to investors which gave the amount of accelerated fees; they had disclosed in Form ADV that they may receive accelerated fees; and they had shared the earnings with investors. The SEC focused on the lack of pre-commitment disclosures. The Order notes, without stating if this could have cured the violation, that the advisers did not consult the Limited Partner Advisory Committee, or seek the review and approval of the LPAC for receiving accelerated fees.

As a result of this practice of receiving accelerated fees without adequate pre-commitment disclosure, according to the Order, the advisers negligently violated Advisers Act Section 206(2) (fraud), Section 206(4) and Rule 206(4)-8 (obligations to investors), and Rule 206(4)-7 (the compliance program rule).

This case signals the SEC’s laser focus on fund document language and the timing of disclosures. Avoid Enforcement through clear and conspicuous language in your fund documents, or contact us to help you work through remedial steps.

Post written by Eugenie Warner

Related Content

Latest Content

Advertising Issues: SEC and GIPS Performance in the Private Fund Space

Over a year ago, OCIE released the Risk Alert, “The Most Frequent Advertising Rule Compliance Issues Identified in OCIE Examinations of Investment Advisers.” While the alert highlighted several areas where performance advertising is involved, our recent CSS/Ascendant conference panelists in a session entitled “Best Practices for SEC and GIPS Performance in the Private Fund Space” … Continued

Placing Ethics and Compliance in the Foreground of Business Decision-Making

Thinking about how to make ethics and compliance part of a business’s decision-making can prove to be challenging. By nature, compliance professionals are often results-oriented, focusing on a binary end-result; either you are in compliance, or you are not. That focus is important, but emphasizing process is also vital, John Walsh, Partner at Eversheds Sutherland … Continued

What Am I Looking At? Making Sense of Your Cyber Testing Reports

It’s no surprise that Compliance and IT do not speak the same language. Compliance staff often speak in terms of regulations and policies, whereas bits and bytes are the language of IT staff. This distinction is clear when it comes to cybersecurity risk management, as the compliance and IT audiences are looking for different takeaways … Continued

It Takes a Village – Preparing for a Regulatory Exam

Advanced planning for a regulatory exam remains a vital step in ensuring the compliance team is prepared when the exam teams comes knocking. At the recent Ascendant/CSS fall conference in San Diego, Allison Fraser moderated the conference’s capstone session on the topic, joined by Bryan Bennett, the Associate Regional Director in the examination program in … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.