DOL Fiduciary Rule Transition Period Extension to 2019 Requested

The Secretary of Labor, Alexander Acosta, made a court filing on August 9 requesting the Transition Period and Delay of Applicability for the Department of Labor Fiduciary Rule be extended from January 1, 2018 to July 1, 2019.

This court filing included extending the deadlines for the following Prohibited Contract Exemptions:

  • Best Interest Contract Exemption (PTE 2016-01): Relief for an adviser to still accept variable commissions
  • Class Exemption for Principal Transactions (PTE 2016-02): Relief for an investment adviser or broker-dealer to still engage in a riskless principal or principal transaction
  • PTE 84-24: Relief for an adviser to still accept third-party payments for insurance products

Per most recent guidance, firms are still expected to adhere to the Impartial Conduct Standards component of the Rule throughout the Transition Period, meaning:

  • Acting in the client’s best interest
  • Receiving no more than reasonable compensation
  • Making no misleading statements

Given the request for an extension and other open matters concerning the Fiduciary Rule, Ascendant believes that firms will delay making any additional changes to their policies and practices until further guidance is issued.

Note that this delay comes days after a comment letter the Insured Retirement Institute (IRI) submitted in response to the Department of Labor’s request for comment in June. The IRI letter provided data that the fiduciary rule was “causing customers to lose access to valuable retirement products and services,” citing an increased number of advisers ceasing services for accounts with a small balance. Also this week, the DOL published an FAQ on the Transition Period, stating that recommending to an investor that they increase their contributions to retirement accounts does not constitute fiduciary advice, so long as they do not “include recommendations with respect to specific investment products or recommendations with respect to investment management of a particular security or other investment property.”

With the SEC also issuing a Request for Comment in June regarding Standards of Conduct for Investment Advisers and Broker-Dealers, we expect to see continued developments and cross-agency dialogue on this topic in the coming months. We will continue to keep you informed of new developments.

Related Content

Latest Content

How Do You Supervise for SEC Pay-to-Play Violations?

If you wanted more information about the contours of the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule, or how the SEC may enforce it, three recent Settlement Orders against large investment advisers for “over de minimis” political contributions provide some insight regarding one of the prohibitions: Contributions by Covered Associates to certain Government Officials over the specified Exception amount (capitalized words are terms in the … Continued

Do your Fund Documents Clearly Disclose Receipt of Accelerated Monitoring Fees?

Somewhat more reminiscent of the broken-windows enforcement era, two affiliated private equity advisers managing billions settled with the SEC on charges that they failed to make pre-commitment disclosures in fund governing documents related to accelerated fees received from portfolio companies. Interestingly, according to the Settlement Order, the advisers had made some disclosures in fund documents … Continued

With New Risk Alert, SEC Doubles Down on Best Execution

On July 11, 2018, the SEC issued a Risk Alert outlining commonly found compliance issues related to best execution by investment advisers. Advisers have an obligation to seek best execution of client transactions, taking into consideration quantitative factors such as execution quality and commission rate, as well as more qualitative factors such as the value … Continued

The Cost of Compliance: Understanding and Leveraging Resources

For compliance officers, obtaining the necessary tools and resources to build an effective compliance program can be costly and difficult to implement. How do you distinguish the best in class, the most cost-efficient and effective for use in your program? In this ComplianceCast, speakers David Porteous of Faegre Baker Daniels and Korrine Kohm of Ascendant … Continued

California Privacy Law Brings GDPR-Lite to the U.S.

New Act Will Give Consumers Rights to Access and Delete Their Data In what has become an ongoing race among states to have the toughest privacy regulation in the U.S., California has jumped to the front. On June 28, 2018, California’s legislature unanimously passed a privacy bill that was later signed by Governor Jerry Brown, … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.