How Do You Supervise for SEC Pay-to-Play Violations?

If you wanted more information about the contours of the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule, or how the SEC may enforce it, three recent Settlement Orders against large investment advisers for “over de minimis” political contributions provide some insight regarding one of the prohibitions: Contributions by Covered Associates to certain Government Officials over the specified Exception amount (capitalized words are terms in the SEC’s rule). If a Covered Associate makes a prohibited Contribution, the Rule requires the adviser to take a two-year time out from receiving fees from the relevant Government Client or Investor. Here are some reminders and takeaways, from the language of the respective Settlement Orders:

  • the SEC will enforce the Rule against exempt reporting advisers
  • the Rule can apply to contributions to a covered candidate even if the candidate does not win the election
  • the Rule can apply to candidates for federal office
  • the Rule does not require a showing of quid pro quo or actual intent to influence an Official or Candidate
  • the Rule can apply to Contributions made after the Government Entity has invested with the adviser

Interestingly, in some instances, the Covered Associates had requested and/or obtained a Returned Contribution (the Rule outlines a procedure for this). The Orders are not clear on whether a Returned Contribution could have cured the violation, or avoided the enforcement proceeding; in all instances where there was a returned contribution, there also had been other over de minimis Contributions.

If you have or may have government clients or investors, you must be monitoring contributions and payments and otherwise preventing Pay-to-Play violations. Although some of the contributions in these cases were large, any amount over the specified de minimis amounts will be a violation. (Here, we are just talking about violations under the SEC’s Rule; state and local regulations have their own requirements, and many may prohibit certain contributions of any amount.) Remember, if you are hiring a new employee who will come within the definition of a Covered Associate–either by Rule or your policy–you must confirm whether s/he made relevant contributions in the past, before joining your firm–either 2 years or 6 months depending on the new employee’s position. Take this time to do Pay-to-Play training for your firm, particularly as we are heading into mid-term election season. Ascendant Compliance Management – a CSS Company – often recommends that all contributions are pre-cleared to ensure compliance with the Rule, and we recommend compliance officers check public websites that provide candidate and donor information.

Post written by Eugenie Warner


This Pay to Play Alert originally appeared in Compliance Matters, a weekly regulatory enforcement alert provided to all Ascendant Compliance Manager (ACM) subscribers.

Also with ACM, Covered Associates and employees can preclear political contributions through the ACM Code of Ethics Module. Through ACM, compliance teams can monitor employee personal trading, political contributions, and gifts; manage policies; and distribute trainings—all through a single platform that leverages best-in-breed technology.  Contact us at info@ascendantcompliance.com or (860) 435-2255 to schedule a demo.

Related Content

Latest Content

Do your Fund Documents Clearly Disclose Receipt of Accelerated Monitoring Fees?

Somewhat more reminiscent of the broken-windows enforcement era, two affiliated private equity advisers managing billions settled with the SEC on charges that they failed to make pre-commitment disclosures in fund governing documents related to accelerated fees received from portfolio companies. Interestingly, according to the Settlement Order, the advisers had made some disclosures in fund documents … Continued

With New Risk Alert, SEC Doubles Down on Best Execution

On July 11, 2018, the SEC issued a Risk Alert outlining commonly found compliance issues related to best execution by investment advisers. Advisers have an obligation to seek best execution of client transactions, taking into consideration quantitative factors such as execution quality and commission rate, as well as more qualitative factors such as the value … Continued

The Cost of Compliance: Understanding and Leveraging Resources

For compliance officers, obtaining the necessary tools and resources to build an effective compliance program can be costly and difficult to implement. How do you distinguish the best in class, the most cost-efficient and effective for use in your program? In this ComplianceCast, speakers David Porteous of Faegre Baker Daniels and Korrine Kohm of Ascendant … Continued

California Privacy Law Brings GDPR-Lite to the U.S.

New Act Will Give Consumers Rights to Access and Delete Their Data In what has become an ongoing race among states to have the toughest privacy regulation in the U.S., California has jumped to the front. On June 28, 2018, California’s legislature unanimously passed a privacy bill that was later signed by Governor Jerry Brown, … Continued

SEC Deficiency Letters Require Swift Action

On the topic of SEC Deficiency Letters, if you have received one, you must promptly take corrective action. The SEC will not tolerate inappropriate delay. The SEC recently imposed an $8 million civil penalty on an adviser who, among other things, failed to promptly take corrective action in its Form ADV filing, following receipt of … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.