NFA CPOs/CTAs, Beware Late Filing Penalties

For firms registered with the National Futures Association (NFA) as commodity pool operators (CPOs) or commodity trading advisors (CTAs) and are required to file NFA Form PQR or PR, you better start getting those filings in on time! The self-regulatory organization recently amended its Compliance Rule 2-46 to impose a $200 late fee for each business day that members are late with their filings. This late fee will become effective for all such filings starting on September 30, 2016.

The NFA uses the information contained in these filings made by CPOs and CTAs by integrating them into its risk management system.  This information assists the organization in determining which member firms to examine, and helps in identifying firms that warrant additional monitoring. However, the NFA has historically experienced problems with firms submitting late filings of Forms PQR or PR, despite stepping up efforts to follow-up with those late filers.

Starting on September 30, for Form PQR, the late fee will apply to the CPO entity and will not be assessed on each pool operated by the CPO that has a late filing. The idea is of course to reduce the number of late filers, and to impose the same practice the NFA currently adheres to with respect to late financial filings made by futures commission merchants, Forex dealers and introducing broker members.  Additionally, the organization indicated that the imposition of late fees will not preclude the NFA from taking disciplinary action against firms under NFA’s Compliance Rules for failure to comply with the filing deadlines – a very clear message that NFA is taking the issue of late filers quite seriously.

More information on this amendment to the rules can be found in the organization’s May 31, 2016 Submission Letter to the CFTC.

If you have questions about your Form PQR or PR filings, please call us at 860-435-2255 or email info@ascendantcompliance.com for more information.

Latest Content

When Policies, Procedures and Testing Protocols Aren’t Enough…

The Compliance Program Rule continues to be a powerful tool for SEC enforcement, recently used by the SEC to address trading away in wrap accounts, misappropriation of retail client assets, and the misuse of an omnibus account. Advisory firms had written policies and procedures and testing protocols, but they were not good enough; are yours? … Continued

The Compliance Professionals Guide to Effective Trade Desk Monitoring

Global regulators continue to enhance their ability to monitor the activities of market participants through a combination of new rules, filing requirements, and upgrades to surveillance technologies. As a result, many market participants, including both buy-and sell-side firms, need to re-assess how they currently monitor the trading desk, and whether new policies and procedures are … Continued

How Do You Supervise for SEC Pay-to-Play Violations?

If you wanted more information about the contours of the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule, or how the SEC may enforce it, three recent Settlement Orders against large investment advisers for “over de minimis” political contributions provide some insight regarding one of the prohibitions: Contributions by Covered Associates to certain Government Officials over the specified Exception amount (capitalized words are terms in the … Continued

Do your Fund Documents Clearly Disclose Receipt of Accelerated Monitoring Fees?

Somewhat more reminiscent of the broken-windows enforcement era, two affiliated private equity advisers managing billions settled with the SEC on charges that they failed to make pre-commitment disclosures in fund governing documents related to accelerated fees received from portfolio companies. Interestingly, according to the Settlement Order, the advisers had made some disclosures in fund documents … Continued

With New Risk Alert, SEC Doubles Down on Best Execution

On July 11, 2018, the SEC issued a Risk Alert outlining commonly found compliance issues related to best execution by investment advisers. Advisers have an obligation to seek best execution of client transactions, taking into consideration quantitative factors such as execution quality and commission rate, as well as more qualitative factors such as the value … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.