Observations on CCO Liability

Concerns and confusion regarding CCO liability still abound. Here are a few words on the topic…

CCOs Worry About Liability Even Amidst SEC Assurances
I think it is telling that CCOs are worried about CCO liability, even with clear messaging from the SEC that the agency views CCOs as important “partners.”  Our recent ComplianceCast polling revealed 89% of the CCOs attending said they are worried about liability, with a mere 11% saying they were not. Interestingly, 100% do not currently have CCO liability insurance.

Concerns Voiced about Outsourced CCOs apply Equally to “In-house” CCOs
OCIE talks about the growing trend in outsourced CCOs in its November Risk Alert, offering observations of what works and what doesn’t. And of the highlighted observations, seems to me one can apply the same considerations whether the CCO is an employee, outsourced contractor or consultant. They still must be empowered and knowledgeable, with the authority to be effective. And what about wearing multiple hats? Former Commissioner Luis Aguilar said, “The vast majority of these Enforcement cases [against CCOs]  involved CCOs who “wore more than one hat…”  “In fact, since the adoption of Rule 206(4)7, enforcement actions against individuals with CCO only titles and job functions have been rare. For example, over the last 11 years, the Commission brought only eight cases against such CCOs.”

Lessons Learned from CCO Enforcement Cases
It’s been said the SEC Enforcement cases against CCOs revolve around whether the CCO had responsibility to manage a specific issue and failed to perform his/her responsibilities in good faith—such as having had knowledge, and either failed to adopt policies and procedures to address them or failed to carry them out. Another case, where the CCO was not named, involved  the CCO asking for additional resources. All these cases deliver a strong message to CCOs and contribute to new or continued worries about liability.

Related Content

Latest Content

When Policies, Procedures and Testing Protocols Aren’t Enough…

The Compliance Program Rule continues to be a powerful tool for SEC enforcement, recently used by the SEC to address trading away in wrap accounts, misappropriation of retail client assets, and the misuse of an omnibus account. Advisory firms had written policies and procedures and testing protocols, but they were not good enough; are yours? … Continued

The Compliance Professionals Guide to Effective Trade Desk Monitoring

Global regulators continue to enhance their ability to monitor the activities of market participants through a combination of new rules, filing requirements, and upgrades to surveillance technologies. As a result, many market participants, including both buy-and sell-side firms, need to re-assess how they currently monitor the trading desk, and whether new policies and procedures are … Continued

How Do You Supervise for SEC Pay-to-Play Violations?

If you wanted more information about the contours of the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule, or how the SEC may enforce it, three recent Settlement Orders against large investment advisers for “over de minimis” political contributions provide some insight regarding one of the prohibitions: Contributions by Covered Associates to certain Government Officials over the specified Exception amount (capitalized words are terms in the … Continued

Do your Fund Documents Clearly Disclose Receipt of Accelerated Monitoring Fees?

Somewhat more reminiscent of the broken-windows enforcement era, two affiliated private equity advisers managing billions settled with the SEC on charges that they failed to make pre-commitment disclosures in fund governing documents related to accelerated fees received from portfolio companies. Interestingly, according to the Settlement Order, the advisers had made some disclosures in fund documents … Continued

With New Risk Alert, SEC Doubles Down on Best Execution

On July 11, 2018, the SEC issued a Risk Alert outlining commonly found compliance issues related to best execution by investment advisers. Advisers have an obligation to seek best execution of client transactions, taking into consideration quantitative factors such as execution quality and commission rate, as well as more qualitative factors such as the value … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.