Planning for the Annual Review and Reporting

Rule 206(4)-7 of the Advisers Act and Rule 38a-1 of the Investment Company Act require an Investment Adviser and a Fund, respectively, to review policies and procedures annually to determine their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation.

The SEC highlights specific focus areas including portfolio management processes, trading practices, proprietary trading, disclosure accuracy, and records maintenance, among other things.

In 2006, then-OCIE Associate Director for Examinations Gene Gohlke listed nine questions that SEC examiners consider in scrutinizing an annual review. Those questions still resonate today and can inform your process.

They include:

  1. Who conducted the review?
  2. What was reviewed?
  3. When was it conducted?
  4. How was it conducted?
  5. What were the findings from the review work?
  6. What recommendations were made?
  7. What is the current status of implement recommendations?
  8. What documentation was created/retained to reflect the work done?
  9. What was the involvement of senior management in the review?

To be blunt, the process should be a team effort, with different departments “owning” their subject matters. Doing so allows the CCO to keep compliance on the radar for firm employees and sets the “culture of compliance” that the SEC looks for. It cannot be stressed enough that involving management and employees outside the compliance department sets a tone firm-wide.

In our recent ComplianceCast, “Planning the Annual Review and Reporting,” consultants Allison Fraser and David Lourie go in-depth on the complex topic.

Learning objectives include:

  • Planning and Documentation
  • Testing the Adequacy and Effectiveness of Policies and Procedures
  • Reporting Annual Review Findings
  • Responding to Issues Identified by the Annual Review
  • Common Deficiencies

To download this ComplianceCast presentation, please fill out our request form by clicking here.

Related Content

Latest Content

When Policies, Procedures and Testing Protocols Aren’t Enough…

The Compliance Program Rule continues to be a powerful tool for SEC enforcement, recently used by the SEC to address trading away in wrap accounts, misappropriation of retail client assets, and the misuse of an omnibus account. Advisory firms had written policies and procedures and testing protocols, but they were not good enough; are yours? … Continued

The Compliance Professionals Guide to Effective Trade Desk Monitoring

Global regulators continue to enhance their ability to monitor the activities of market participants through a combination of new rules, filing requirements, and upgrades to surveillance technologies. As a result, many market participants, including both buy-and sell-side firms, need to re-assess how they currently monitor the trading desk, and whether new policies and procedures are … Continued

How Do You Supervise for SEC Pay-to-Play Violations?

If you wanted more information about the contours of the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule, or how the SEC may enforce it, three recent Settlement Orders against large investment advisers for “over de minimis” political contributions provide some insight regarding one of the prohibitions: Contributions by Covered Associates to certain Government Officials over the specified Exception amount (capitalized words are terms in the … Continued

Do your Fund Documents Clearly Disclose Receipt of Accelerated Monitoring Fees?

Somewhat more reminiscent of the broken-windows enforcement era, two affiliated private equity advisers managing billions settled with the SEC on charges that they failed to make pre-commitment disclosures in fund governing documents related to accelerated fees received from portfolio companies. Interestingly, according to the Settlement Order, the advisers had made some disclosures in fund documents … Continued

With New Risk Alert, SEC Doubles Down on Best Execution

On July 11, 2018, the SEC issued a Risk Alert outlining commonly found compliance issues related to best execution by investment advisers. Advisers have an obligation to seek best execution of client transactions, taking into consideration quantitative factors such as execution quality and commission rate, as well as more qualitative factors such as the value … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.