SEC Examined 11% of Advisers in 2016

The SEC met its stated fiscal year 2016 goal by examining 11 percent of the investment adviser pool. The SEC released the results as part of its annual Summary of Performance and Financial Information.

That number presents a one percent uptick from fiscal year 2015.

Out of the estimated pool of 12,200 investment advisers, that amounts to roughly 1,342 advisers that were covered. Under recently departed SEC Chair Mary Jo White, the SEC shifted personnel from broker exams and explored third-party exams as a way to boost its examination efforts. It’s not known whether that initiative will be pursued by incoming SEC leadership.

However, in January’s National Exam Program Exam Priorities 2017 release, the SEC said it would be expanding its “Never-Before Examined Adviser initiative” to include focused, risk-based examinations of newly registered advisers as well as selected advisers that have been registered for a longer period but have never been examined by OCIE.

Despite the seemingly low number of advisers looked at in 2016, many advisers receive some touch from SEC examiners. During Ascendant’s recent ComplianceCast, “SEC Exam Priorities: What’s Between the Lines & Behind the Scenes,” 74 percent of attendees said their firms have been examined by the Commission.

The SEC cast a wider net on investment companies, examining 17 percent of them in fiscal 2016, exceeding the internal 15 percent projection. Meanwhile, broker-dealers saw 50 percent coverage.

Inside the SEC Exam Program

The SEC’s Exam Program will be a major focus of Ascendant’s upcoming conference on April 3-5 in Naples, Florida, taking attendees through a typical exam journey, highlighting lessons we’ve learned in the field alongside compliance teams and regulators. We’ll go through all the essentials, from how to respond to the SEC’s information requests to handling the in-person interactions to the exit interview and responding to a findings letter. Here’s a look at our SEC Exam track. For more information on the conference, click here.

SEC Exam Track Sessions

  • Special Presentation: SEC Data Analysis of Investment Managers
  • SEC Exam Part 1: First Day Letter & Exam
  • SEC Exam Part 2: What Happens When Regulators Are in Your Office
  • SEC Exam Part 3: The Exit Interview and Responding to a Findings Letter
  • What You Still Want to Know About SEC Exams

Latest Content

Schedule 13D/13F Clarity on ETF Issues

Do I need to file a 13D or 13G if my client accounts hold in excess of 5% of an ETF? Generally, no. The SEC has granted no-action relief to ETFs with respect to compliance with Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act. Section 13(d) was designed to require disclosure when holders begin to accumulate … Continued

New Remedy Coming for SEC’s Custody Rule?

The SEC’s Custody Rule continues to be a common source of confusion and a landmine for noncompliance. Custodial paperwork has caused huge headaches for investment advisers, who are not a party to the agreement and may not even have a copy of the custodial new account paperwork. The issue with existing guidance is that it … Continued

SEC Issues MiFID II No-Action Relief

Some industry anxiety was assuaged on October 26 with three no-action letters that offer relief for some US regulated broker-dealers and investment advisers regarding European MiFID II regulations. The letters followed consultation with the European authorities, and are designed to address concerns that investors could lose access to valuable research. MiFID II is a series of regulations … Continued

Regulatory Changes Impacting RICs and Service Providers

A year ago, the SEC adopted Investment Company Reporting Modernization Rules and Forms, as well as rules pertaining to liquidity risk management programs and swing pricing. New forms N-Port and N-Cen along with amendments to Regulation S-X significantly change the current reporting regime for most registered investment companies (RICs) because they require more comprehensive disclosure and … Continued

Publicly Available Information Heightens Need for Cybersecurity Vigilance

For any business, “ports” that allow for communication generally need to be open (for example, ports 80 and 443 for websites, and port 500 for VPN access). While most of these ports allow you to engage in critical functions, there are often ports that remain open despite being unneeded or unused. These available ports present … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.