SEC Issues MiFID II No-Action Relief

Some industry anxiety was assuaged on October 26 with three no-action letters that offer relief for some US regulated broker-dealers and investment advisers regarding European MiFID II regulations. The letters followed consultation with the European authorities, and are designed to address concerns that investors could lose access to valuable research.

MiFID II is a series of regulations in the EU which will replace the current Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MiFID”) as of January 3, 2018. The MiFID II regulatory regime is designed to increase the transparency and stability of the European capital markets. Its provisions are comprehensive and cover a large swath of activities, including:

  • Research Payments: Advisers subject to MiFID II will no longer be able to accept research as a tangential benefit to trade execution services, the “soft dollar” practice which is common in the U.S. Instead, MiFID II-regulated firms will need to pay hard dollars for research, either from their own P&L or from a MiFID II regulated Research Payment Account (“RPA”).
  • Best Execution: MiFID I required firms to “take all reasonable steps to obtain, when executing orders, the best possible result for their clients taking into account price, costs, speed, likelihood of execution and settlement, size, nature or any other consideration relevant to the execution of the order.”[1] MiFID II requires firms to take “all sufficient steps.” Firms are responsible for implementing policies and procedures to ensure that execution practices are working well and issues or deficiencies are promptly found and remediated.
  • Trade and Transaction Reporting: New pre- and post‐trade reporting, along with T+1 transaction reporting, will become mandatory and will lead to new publication entities emerging as authorized APAs (Approved Publication Arrangements) to support near real‐time, post‐trade reporting. T+1 transaction reporting will operate either directly through the local National Competent Authority (NCA) or via an authorised Approved Reporting Mechanism (ARM). Where firms were previously required to submit only 24 data fields for certain financial instruments (primarily exchange-traded Equities and certain derivatives), firms are now required to submit 65 data fields across an increased universe of financial instruments. Firms trading on European trading venues are already starting to update their systems to provide such information, as well as obtaining new data such as a Legal Entity Identifier (“LEI”).
  • Position Limits: Firms will be subject to limits on the maximum size of position that can be held in commodity derivatives (aggregated across trading venues and OTC).
  • Product Governance: MiFID II will require firms to “act in the clients’ best interests during all stages of the life-cycle of products or services.”[2] This means the marketing and distribution of financial products to consumers will require increased disclosure, as well as in-depth analysis of “target market” for a given offering.

The no-action relief provides a path for market participants to comply with the research requirements of MiFID II in a manner that is consistent with US federal securities laws.

The three letters provide the following relief, in short summary:

  • SIFMA: In a letter to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, the Division of Investment Management provided temporary relief for broker-dealers that provide research services to Managers, generally, that the Division will not recommend enforcement action to the SEC if a broker-dealer provides research services that constitute investment advice. In other words, the Division will not consider those broker-dealers to be investment advisers. Without this relief, broker-dealers may have been providing investment advice and subject to regulation under the Advisers Act, when they received Research Payments. This relief is valid only for thirty months from the MiFID II implementation date, at which time we expect further guidance from the SEC.
  • SIFMA Asset Management Group: In a letter to the SIFMA Asset Management Group, the Division of Trading and Markets staff stated it will not recommend enforcement action to the SEC against a money manager relying on Section 28(e) of the Exchange Act, when it complies with the MiFID II RPA requirements, in the following 4 circumstances: the money manager makes payments to executing broker-dealer out of client assets for research alongside payments to that executing broker-dealer for execution; the research payments are for research services eligible for Section 28(e)’s safe harbor; the executing broker-dealer effects the transactions for purposes of 28(e); and the executing broker-dealer is legally obligated by contract with the money manager to pay for research through the use of an RPA in connection with a CCA.
  • Investment Company Institute (“ICI”): In its letter to ICI, the Division of Investment Management provided relief under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Advisers Act, to permit advisers subject to MiFID II to continue to aggregate client orders, where some clients may pay different amounts for research because of MiFID II requirements but all clients will receive the same average price for the security and execution costs.

We encourage all firms impacted by MiFID II to take action to ensure that any required changes to policies, procedures and internal systems are complete by the January 3, 2018 compliance date.


MiFID II Ready with CSS

CSS TradeSentry provides trading surveillance and post-trade compliance tools to perform transaction cost analysis, broker analysis, and commission testing, powered by Ascendant industry expertise and IHS Markit reference data.

Silverfinch provides regulatory data management solutions, with streams tailored for asset managers and distributors to comply with product governance requirements under MiFID II.

Advise Technologies offers global regulatory reporting solutions through its Consensus, Vault and Signal product lines, including MiFID II transaction reporting as an Approved Reporting Mechanism (ARM).

Contact us at info@ascendantcompliance.com or at (860) 435-2255 to learn more about how the CSS product suite can assist your firm in meeting its MiFID II requirements.

Related Content

Latest Content

Custody Concerns Continue

You timely filed your Form ADV within 90 days of fiscal year end, but did you properly answer all the questions related to custody? Not surprisingly, the Form remains confusing for many advisers, as does application of the Custody Rule itself. The SEC has issued guidance, letters to the industry, alerts and FAQs, but things … Continued

Blockchain Isn’t Hot Sauce

Guest post by Samson Williams, Partner – Axes & Eggs and Keynote Speaker – Ascendant CSS Spring 2019 Conference  I started telling people that blockchain isn’t hot sauce in mid-2017 to help explain why initial coin offerings (ICOs) were just the latest form of unregulated, online gambling. In November 2017, with Bitcoin nearing a high … Continued

The Importance of Effective ADV Disclosure: Staying Ahead of the Regulators

This ComplianceCast will discuss how firms can mitigate risk by having effective disclosure in their Form ADV Brochure. Our panelists will be CSS Ascendant Senior Consultant Ariana Monchick and Jessica Matelis, Partner at Foley & Lardner and former Senior Counsel at the SEC Division of Enforcement. They will discuss: Required disclosures The types of conflicts … Continued

Regulation Best Interest, Cybersecurity Top Concerns at IAA 2019 Compliance Conference

The Investment Adviser Association (IAA) represents the interests of investment advisers in Washington D.C., and the IAA Investment Adviser Compliance Conference 2019 was a forum for the discussion of future potential rulemaking. Cybersecurity and Fiduciary Rule considerations were headline topics, with custody and marketing right behind. The following is a summary of key issues discussed … Continued

The Challenges of Building a Global Compliance Program

Compliance programs face challenges in balancing global requirements with local exceptions while incorporating the fast pace of regulatory change, addressing critical business needs and obtaining the necessary resources necessary to manage the program. Trends and thinking on the subject were center stage at the recent CSS London event “Looking at the Year Ahead – Global … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.