SEC: Prioritizing Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity is now a priority for many investment advisers to address. On June 14, SEC Chair Mary Jo White echoed that sentiment in her testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

“Cybersecurity is – as I have said before – one of the greatest risks facing the financial services industry and will be for the foreseeable future,” Chair White said in her remarks. She went on to note that the SEC has taken a “proactive” approach that includes “examining and enforcing the rules we oversee that relate to cybersecurity.”

Reading between the lines, it appears that the SEC does not need a new Cybersecurity Rule to enforce requirements. Rather, the Commission appears willing and able to enforce existing regulations that already address cybersecurity – particularly Rule 30(a) of Regulation S-P, which requires registered investment advisers to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to safeguard customer records and information.

Regulation S-P violations have paved the way for the SEC to bring two cybersecurity enforcement actions against investment advisers within the last nine months – first, against RT Jones in September 2015 and more recently against Morgan Stanley Smith Barney in June 2016.

SEC’s 2016 Efforts on Cybersecurity Exams

Chair White stated that the SEC is focusing on “ensuring that our registered entities have policies and procedures to address the risks posed to their systems and data by cyberattacks,” explaining that the agency has expanded its cybersecurity examinations to include testing of firms’ implementation of procedures and controls.

The SEC is currently examining these issues at firms in 2016, and recently announced the promotion of Christopher Hetner to the role of Senior Advisor to the Chair for Cybersecurity Policy. Mr. Hetner, a former chief information security officer at GE Capital, is the Cybersecurity Lead for the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) Technology Controls Program.

Chair White’s full testimony is available by clicking here.

Related Content

Latest Content

Evolution of Fiduciary Rules Begins to Take Shape in SEC

On April 18, 2018, the SEC voted to propose several new rules and reforms related to fiduciary standards. The package intends to raise and clarify standards of conduct for broker-dealers and investment advisers, and to provide clarity regarding fees, conflicts and other material matters. It also aims to ensure that the standards can be understood … Continued

Insurance Considerations for Investment Advisers

How much coverage is enough? What types of insurance policies do you need? Whether you are starting an investment advisory practice, launching a new line of business, or reevaluating your existing risks, there are critical questions to ask to make sure you understand the various ways to protect your firm. Join us for a practical … Continued

Fifth Circuit Weighs In on DOL Fiduciary Rule

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has vacated the Department of Labor’s Fiduciary Rule. In a 2-1 split, the Fifth Circuit’s decision overrules a Dallas District Court’s decision, which had previously upheld the rule. Unfortunately, the decision does little to settle the fate of the beleaguered rule. Although it … Continued

SEC Proposes Amending Investment Company Liquidity Disclosures in Forms N-PORT and N-1A

On March 14, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) proposed amendments to the mutual fund liquidity-related disclosure requirements. Specifically, the proposal: Adds a new requirement to “briefly discuss the operation and effectiveness of the Fund’s liquidity risk management program during the most recently completed fiscal year” in the Fund’s Management Discussion of Fund Performance … Continued

Paradigm Shift in SEC Exams, Benefits of a Mock Exam

For investment advisers currently going through an SEC exam, the process likely bears little resemblance to exams of old. Call it the new normal, a paradigm shift, or simply the effects of the SEC having to do more with less, but anecdotal evidence among those now experiencing the exam process suggests some interesting new trends. … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.