SEC’s Exam Priorities Offer Insight Into National Exam Program

On February 7, 2018, the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (“OCIE”) issued their 2018 Examination Priorities (see Ascendant’s summary here). In addition to defining their examination priorities for the year, the OCIE staff offered some insight into the National Exam Program.  Specifically, they defined the following five principles in executing their exam priorities:

  • Risk-based – OCIE realizes that the size of the securities industry prevents them from conducting regular, comprehensive examinations of every firm. The staff considers risk in setting priorities, selecting firms to examine and determining the scope of exams.
  • Data-driven – OCIE acknowledges that they utilize data in setting priorities and evaluating risk. Over the past several years, the SEC has added quantitative capabilities for analyzing trade blotters and market data.
  • Transparency – OCIE believes that publicly sharing information about the exam program enables firms to achieve compliance with the securities laws, thus helping investors. In fiscal year 2017, OCIE published six Risk Alerts, which identified issues for registrants to consider.
  • Highest and Best Use of Resources – OCIE recognizes that their resources are limited, and attempts to leverage their talent, technology and data analysis in an effort to maximize the benefit to investors.
  • Embrace Innovation and Technology – Technology in the financial markets often leads to innovation in ways that benefit investors, such as improving access or driving down cost. OCIE works to keep pace with advancing technological innovations and recognizes the threats through cybersecurity attacks.

Look familiar? In many ways, these principles are the hallmarks of an effective compliance organization. As OCIE has focused on increasing transparency, advisers and broker-dealers will be well served to pay attention to OCIE’s guidance and make sure that their compliance programs are up to par.

OCIE’s full priorities paper can be found here.


If you need help with your compliance program, Ascendant’has technological and consulting solutions to fit every business and budget. Contact us today via email or at 860-435-2255.

Related Content

Latest Content

Do your Fund Documents Clearly Disclose Receipt of Accelerated Monitoring Fees?

Somewhat more reminiscent of the broken-windows enforcement era, two affiliated private equity advisers managing billions settled with the SEC on charges that they failed to make pre-commitment disclosures in fund governing documents related to accelerated fees received from portfolio companies. Interestingly, according to the Settlement Order, the advisers had made some disclosures in fund documents … Continued

With New Risk Alert, SEC Doubles Down on Best Execution

On July 11, 2018, the SEC issued a Risk Alert outlining commonly found compliance issues related to best execution by investment advisers. Advisers have an obligation to seek best execution of client transactions, taking into consideration quantitative factors such as execution quality and commission rate, as well as more qualitative factors such as the value … Continued

The Cost of Compliance: Understanding and Leveraging Resources

For compliance officers, obtaining the necessary tools and resources to build an effective compliance program can be costly and difficult to implement. How do you distinguish the best in class, the most cost-efficient and effective for use in your program? In this ComplianceCast, speakers David Porteous of Faegre Baker Daniels and Korrine Kohm of Ascendant … Continued

California Privacy Law Brings GDPR-Lite to the U.S.

New Act Will Give Consumers Rights to Access and Delete Their Data In what has become an ongoing race among states to have the toughest privacy regulation in the U.S., California has jumped to the front. On June 28, 2018, California’s legislature unanimously passed a privacy bill that was later signed by Governor Jerry Brown, … Continued

SEC Deficiency Letters Require Swift Action

On the topic of SEC Deficiency Letters, if you have received one, you must promptly take corrective action. The SEC will not tolerate inappropriate delay. The SEC recently imposed an $8 million civil penalty on an adviser who, among other things, failed to promptly take corrective action in its Form ADV filing, following receipt of … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.