The Perils of ‘End-to-End’ Solutions to SEC Reporting Modernization That Don’t Go From End-to-End

One of the common idioms here in the US that my European colleagues may not be familiar with is “soup to nuts,” meaning from beginning to end. As I sat down to write this piece for the Accudelta blog, it jumped out at me that one of the biggest risks that the mutual fund industry is taking right now is the assumption that their service providers’ “full” solution to Form N-PORT does actually include soup and nuts.

There is no doubt that for many firms that have historically partnered with one of their service providers for regulatory reporting, their first port of call will of course be to look to them to solve next year’s SEC Reporting Modernization challenge. The difference with this regulation can be highlighted in two key points in my view:

  • There is a huge increase in the amount of data that is required and needs to be managed, and not all of this (typically less than 70%) sits with the service provider today
  • The increase in reporting frequency from quarterly to monthly compresses the available time for data processing and compliance signoff by a factor of three

In other words, there is a lot more data that needs to be sourced and managed, and that all needs to be turned around and signed off in 30 days instead of 90. This is a significant technical and operational challenge.

It strikes me that too much conversation is being spent talking about liquidity and filing, when in reality these elements are soluble in a straightforward manner and will be part of the “entrée” of any solution.

The heavy lifting comes outside of this, and here it would very much appear that service providers are either grossly underestimating or downplaying the complexities associated with the data management and signoff challenges above – when push comes to shove, the mutual fund complexes are going to have to solve these problems themselves outside of the “complete” solution that their service provider has kindly served up.

Data management is more than accepting data in a number of templates or formats; the workflow around data aggregation, validation, and quality control to ensure that the information being filed is up-to-date and accurate is complex and requires a technical (and operational) solution that is designed for this purpose.

Likewise, to enable efficient signoff of the actual form before it is filed – technology needs to be employed to make this process as streamlined as possible – mutual fund complexes should not be left with a pile of paper and highlighter pens.

If you are looking to address the Reporting Modernization challenge, I would urge you to invest the time now to thoroughly understand how the above will be addressed in your proposed solution and target operating model. Use demonstrations and proofs of concepts now as tools to ensure that you are not left scrambling to prepare soup at the last minute – promises of future capabilities are not good enough; these capabilities need to be in place today.

For many fund complexes the data challenge above is significant – this work needs to be happening right now.

By 2018, it will be too late for complaints.


Guest Post written by Accudelta Managing Director Conor Smyth.
Accudelta, like Ascendant, is part of Compliance Solutions Strategies, a leading provider of technology-enabled regulatory and compliance solutions to the financial services industry.

Latest Content

Schedule 13D/13F Clarity on ETF Issues

Do I need to file a 13D or 13G if my client accounts hold in excess of 5% of an ETF? Generally, no. The SEC has granted no-action relief to ETFs with respect to compliance with Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act. Section 13(d) was designed to require disclosure when holders begin to accumulate … Continued

New Remedy Coming for SEC’s Custody Rule?

The SEC’s Custody Rule continues to be a common source of confusion and a landmine for noncompliance. Custodial paperwork has caused huge headaches for investment advisers, who are not a party to the agreement and may not even have a copy of the custodial new account paperwork. The issue with existing guidance is that it … Continued

SEC Issues MiFID II No-Action Relief

Some industry anxiety was assuaged on October 26 with three no-action letters that offer relief for some US regulated broker-dealers and investment advisers regarding European MiFID II regulations. The letters followed consultation with the European authorities, and are designed to address concerns that investors could lose access to valuable research. MiFID II is a series of regulations … Continued

Regulatory Changes Impacting RICs and Service Providers

A year ago, the SEC adopted Investment Company Reporting Modernization Rules and Forms, as well as rules pertaining to liquidity risk management programs and swing pricing. New forms N-Port and N-Cen along with amendments to Regulation S-X significantly change the current reporting regime for most registered investment companies (RICs) because they require more comprehensive disclosure and … Continued

Publicly Available Information Heightens Need for Cybersecurity Vigilance

For any business, “ports” that allow for communication generally need to be open (for example, ports 80 and 443 for websites, and port 500 for VPN access). While most of these ports allow you to engage in critical functions, there are often ports that remain open despite being unneeded or unused. These available ports present … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.