The Problem with Buying Off-the-Shelf: It May Not Fit!

The Fort Worth, Texas, Regional Office (“FWRO”) of the SEC recently named the failure to sufficiently tailor off-the-shelf compliance programs as one of its most cited deficiencies during regulatory exams in 2017. According to the FWRO, such deficiencies were present in nearly half of all examinations conducted by them.

The news came during a first-of-its-kind call directly between the FWRO and over 2,000 industry members. The call consisted of a discussion of the exam program, investor risk highlights and a question-and-answer session. Although 11 deficiencies were mentioned during the exam priorities section, much of the call focused on the need to address individual-based risks through a well-designed compliance program.

The FWRO noted findings that many firms used “canned” compliance programs that were not tailored to the adviser’s business, and in some extreme cases the policies even included the names of other advisers. Those advisers that participated on the call were also reminded that the Compliance Rule requires issues from the previous year to be catalogued in an annual review and addressed in a timely manner. Finally, the FWRO stated that it was “no fan” of chief compliance officers with too many other roles.

So, what does this mean for investment advisers? A couple of things, but most importantly the need to ensure your policies are customized based on your business, affiliations, conflicts of interest and protocols.

Make sure that your compliance program receives sufficient attention and is sufficiently tailored. A good first step could be using Ascendant’s Risk Matrix Tool, housed on the  Ascendant Compliance Manager, to inventory the risks posed to your specific business model and determine if your policies adequately address those risks. You should also review your previous annual reviews to ensure that the issues identified in them have been remediated. From there, you should establish whether or not your policies and procedures are reasonably designed to effectively confront these risks.


For more information, or for a demo of Ascendant’s Risk Matrix Tool, please contact us at info@ascendantcompliance.com or call us at 860-435-2255.

Related Content

Latest Content

How Do You Supervise for SEC Pay-to-Play Violations?

If you wanted more information about the contours of the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule, or how the SEC may enforce it, three recent Settlement Orders against large investment advisers for “over de minimis” political contributions provide some insight regarding one of the prohibitions: Contributions by Covered Associates to certain Government Officials over the specified Exception amount (capitalized words are terms in the … Continued

Do your Fund Documents Clearly Disclose Receipt of Accelerated Monitoring Fees?

Somewhat more reminiscent of the broken-windows enforcement era, two affiliated private equity advisers managing billions settled with the SEC on charges that they failed to make pre-commitment disclosures in fund governing documents related to accelerated fees received from portfolio companies. Interestingly, according to the Settlement Order, the advisers had made some disclosures in fund documents … Continued

With New Risk Alert, SEC Doubles Down on Best Execution

On July 11, 2018, the SEC issued a Risk Alert outlining commonly found compliance issues related to best execution by investment advisers. Advisers have an obligation to seek best execution of client transactions, taking into consideration quantitative factors such as execution quality and commission rate, as well as more qualitative factors such as the value … Continued

The Cost of Compliance: Understanding and Leveraging Resources

For compliance officers, obtaining the necessary tools and resources to build an effective compliance program can be costly and difficult to implement. How do you distinguish the best in class, the most cost-efficient and effective for use in your program? In this ComplianceCast, speakers David Porteous of Faegre Baker Daniels and Korrine Kohm of Ascendant … Continued

California Privacy Law Brings GDPR-Lite to the U.S.

New Act Will Give Consumers Rights to Access and Delete Their Data In what has become an ongoing race among states to have the toughest privacy regulation in the U.S., California has jumped to the front. On June 28, 2018, California’s legislature unanimously passed a privacy bill that was later signed by Governor Jerry Brown, … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.