Two-Thirds Expect Delay, Revisions to DOL Fiduciary Rule

With the presidential inauguration weeks away, there is little clarity about what the incoming administration will do in regards to the Department of Labor Fiduciary regulation.

President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to head the DOL, Andrew Puzder, so far has not yet commented on the rule, which would require financial advisers to retirement accounts to act in their clients’ best interests.

Ascendant recently polled a group of compliance professionals who attended our most recent ComplianceCast, “Highlights of 2016, A Look Forward to 2017,” with interesting results.

Of the group, nearly two-thirds (64%) believed that the rule would be delayed with a plan to revise. Meanwhile, 19% believe it will be implemented as scheduled on April 10, 2017, and 17% believe it will be withdrawn.

Because of the lengthy process involved in removing a regulation off the books, it may require some hard work if the Trump administration wants to kill it.

Still, there are some that believe that the withdrawal of the regulation could be ultimately beneficial for the registered investment adviser model.

Fred Reish of Drinker, Biddle & Reath makes that case here:

Over the years, more and more 401(k) plans have shifted to advisors who work in the RIA model because of its transparency, the focus on advice, and the avoidance of conflicts of interest. Part of that change was attributable to RIAs marketing themselves as fiduciary advisors. It’s possible that, going forward, RIAs will market their IRA services as fiduciaries, pointing out that non-fiduciary advisors have a lower standard of care (the suitability standard) and have conflicts in how they are compensated for selling certain products over others.

Further clarity should be materialize in the coming weeks, but it seems clear that while change is possible and delay is likely, the weeks and months to come will bring plenty to keep an eye on.

ComplianceCasts are broadcast monthly, focusing on key areas of interest for compliance, operational, and management personnel. Recent editions include Portfolio Management and TradingDue Diligence of Third-Party Service Providers, and Planning for the Annual Review and Reporting. The full archive can be accessed by clicking here.

Latest Content

Schedule 13D/13F Clarity on ETF Issues

Do I need to file a 13D or 13G if my client accounts hold in excess of 5% of an ETF? Generally, no. The SEC has granted no-action relief to ETFs with respect to compliance with Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act. Section 13(d) was designed to require disclosure when holders begin to accumulate … Continued

New Remedy Coming for SEC’s Custody Rule?

The SEC’s Custody Rule continues to be a common source of confusion and a landmine for noncompliance. Custodial paperwork has caused huge headaches for investment advisers, who are not a party to the agreement and may not even have a copy of the custodial new account paperwork. The issue with existing guidance is that it … Continued

SEC Issues MiFID II No-Action Relief

Some industry anxiety was assuaged on October 26 with three no-action letters that offer relief for some US regulated broker-dealers and investment advisers regarding European MiFID II regulations. The letters followed consultation with the European authorities, and are designed to address concerns that investors could lose access to valuable research. MiFID II is a series of regulations … Continued

Regulatory Changes Impacting RICs and Service Providers

A year ago, the SEC adopted Investment Company Reporting Modernization Rules and Forms, as well as rules pertaining to liquidity risk management programs and swing pricing. New forms N-Port and N-Cen along with amendments to Regulation S-X significantly change the current reporting regime for most registered investment companies (RICs) because they require more comprehensive disclosure and … Continued

Publicly Available Information Heightens Need for Cybersecurity Vigilance

For any business, “ports” that allow for communication generally need to be open (for example, ports 80 and 443 for websites, and port 500 for VPN access). While most of these ports allow you to engage in critical functions, there are often ports that remain open despite being unneeded or unused. These available ports present … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.