With New Risk Alert, SEC Doubles Down on Best Execution

On July 11, 2018, the SEC issued a Risk Alert outlining commonly found compliance issues related to best execution by investment advisers.

Advisers have an obligation to seek best execution of client transactions, taking into consideration quantitative factors such as execution quality and commission rate, as well as more qualitative factors such as the value of research provided and responsiveness to the adviser. There is no single determinative factor in broker selection; rather, an adviser should seek to obtain in all transactions the best execution for the client account.

Advisers must systematically and periodically review execution quality and maintain documentation to that effect.

The most common compliance issues related to best execution include:

  • Failure to perform best execution reviews – Advisers either did not periodically and systematically evaluate best execution or they failed to maintain documentation to evidence such evaluation
  • Failure to consider materially relevant factors during best execution reviews – Advisers did not consider the full range and quality of a broker-dealer’s services (e.g. not incorporating qualitative factors or not seeking input from the trading desk)
  • Failure to seek comparisons from other broker-dealers – Advisers utilized certain broker-dealers without seeking out or considering the quality and costs of services available from other broker-dealers
  • Failure to fully disclose best execution practices – Advisers did not provide full disclosure of best execution practices (e.g. not disclosing that certain types of client accounts may trade the same securities after other client accounts and the potential impact of this practice on execution prices)
  • Failure to disclose soft dollar arrangements – Under Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), an adviser may pay more than the lowest commission rate in soft dollar arrangements without breaching its fiduciary obligation, provided that certain specified conditions are met. Some advisers failed to provide full and fair disclosure of soft dollar arrangements (e.g. certain clients may bear more of the cost of soft dollar arrangements than other clients or arrangements where products and services were acquired that did not qualify as eligible brokerage and research services under Section 28(e))
  • Failure to properly administer mixed use allocations – Advisers did not appear to make a reasonable allocation of the cost of a mixed use product or service according to its use or did not produce support, through documentation or otherwise, of the rationale for mixed use allocations
  • Failure to implement or follow best execution policies and procedures – Advisers appeared to have inadequate compliance policies and procedures or internal controls regarding best execution or failed to follow policies and procedures (e.g. commitments to monitor and review best execution on an ongoing basis)

About TradeSentry™

TradeSentry is a post-trade compliance and trade surveillance solution covering everything from best execution review to insider trading detection. TradeSentry can enable your compliance team to:

  • Monitor execution performance by account, broker, or trading venue using transaction cost analysis
  • Analyze trading volumes, commissions, and fees for executing brokers
  • Compare soft-dollar broker performance to hard-dollar broker performance
  • Benchmark execution quality with access to industry-leading reference data from Markit TCA™ for equity, fixed-income and foreign exchange
  • Collaborate with traders and portfolio managers directly in the tool – no more fragmented email chains
  • Create best execution compliance reports for Rule 206(4)-7 annual testing

TradeSentry is secure, cloud-based and backed by years of Ascendant experience in the field.

Tackle your trading compliance challenge systematically with TradeSentry by scheduling a demo today.

About Ascendant Services

Ascendant’s experienced consultants can review your firm’s best execution policies and procedures as part of an annual review engagement, assisting you in identifying any gaps or material risks.

For more information, contact info@ascendantcompliance.com or call (860) 435–2255.


Post written by Brian DeDonato & Kelley Merwin

Related Content

Latest Content

Regulation Best Interest, Cybersecurity Top Concerns at IAA 2019 Compliance Conference

The Investment Adviser Association (IAA) represents the interests of investment advisers in Washington D.C., and the IAA Investment Adviser Compliance Conference 2019 was a forum for the discussion of future potential rulemaking. Cybersecurity and Fiduciary Rule considerations were headline topics, with custody and marketing right behind. The following is a summary of key issues discussed … Continued

The Challenges of Building a Global Compliance Program

Compliance programs face challenges in balancing global requirements with local exceptions while incorporating the fast pace of regulatory change, addressing critical business needs and obtaining the necessary resources necessary to manage the program. Trends and thinking on the subject were center stage at the recent CSS London event “Looking at the Year Ahead – Global … Continued

Coming to America – California Adopts GDPR-Like Privacy Regulation

After a number of firms struggled last year to get their marketing and information systems into compliance with the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), advisers to U.S. clients will soon be facing similar requirements on the home front.  On the heels of the Cambridge Analytica scandal, California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act of … Continued

SEC and FINRA 2019 Examination Priorities

The SEC and FINRA have recently released their examination priorities for 2019. These releases provide insight into regulatory priorities and serve as guidance for a firm in evaluating its compliance program. We will discuss topics covered in these releases, including: Protecting retail investors Fees and expenses Disclosure Conflicts of interest Suitability Protecting senior investors Trading … Continued

SEC Reopened After 35-Day Government Shutdown

SEC Chairman Jay Clayton announced on Saturday, January 26 that with an agreement reached to end the government shutdown, the “Commission has resumed normal staffing levels and is returning to normal operations.” In total, about 94% of the commission’s approximately 4,400 employees had been furloughed during the 35-day shutdown, according to its operations plan. In a … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.