With New Risk Alert, SEC Doubles Down on Best Execution

On July 11, 2018, the SEC issued a Risk Alert outlining commonly found compliance issues related to best execution by investment advisers.

Advisers have an obligation to seek best execution of client transactions, taking into consideration quantitative factors such as execution quality and commission rate, as well as more qualitative factors such as the value of research provided and responsiveness to the adviser. There is no single determinative factor in broker selection; rather, an adviser should seek to obtain in all transactions the best execution for the client account.

Advisers must systematically and periodically review execution quality and maintain documentation to that effect.

The most common compliance issues related to best execution include:

  • Failure to perform best execution reviews – Advisers either did not periodically and systematically evaluate best execution or they failed to maintain documentation to evidence such evaluation
  • Failure to consider materially relevant factors during best execution reviews – Advisers did not consider the full range and quality of a broker-dealer’s services (e.g. not incorporating qualitative factors or not seeking input from the trading desk)
  • Failure to seek comparisons from other broker-dealers – Advisers utilized certain broker-dealers without seeking out or considering the quality and costs of services available from other broker-dealers
  • Failure to fully disclose best execution practices – Advisers did not provide full disclosure of best execution practices (e.g. not disclosing that certain types of client accounts may trade the same securities after other client accounts and the potential impact of this practice on execution prices)
  • Failure to disclose soft dollar arrangements – Under Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), an adviser may pay more than the lowest commission rate in soft dollar arrangements without breaching its fiduciary obligation, provided that certain specified conditions are met. Some advisers failed to provide full and fair disclosure of soft dollar arrangements (e.g. certain clients may bear more of the cost of soft dollar arrangements than other clients or arrangements where products and services were acquired that did not qualify as eligible brokerage and research services under Section 28(e))
  • Failure to properly administer mixed use allocations – Advisers did not appear to make a reasonable allocation of the cost of a mixed use product or service according to its use or did not produce support, through documentation or otherwise, of the rationale for mixed use allocations
  • Failure to implement or follow best execution policies and procedures – Advisers appeared to have inadequate compliance policies and procedures or internal controls regarding best execution or failed to follow policies and procedures (e.g. commitments to monitor and review best execution on an ongoing basis)

About TradeSentry™

TradeSentry is a post-trade compliance and trade surveillance solution covering everything from best execution review to insider trading detection. TradeSentry can enable your compliance team to:

  • Monitor execution performance by account, broker, or trading venue using transaction cost analysis
  • Analyze trading volumes, commissions, and fees for executing brokers
  • Compare soft-dollar broker performance to hard-dollar broker performance
  • Benchmark execution quality with access to industry-leading reference data from Markit TCA™ for equity, fixed-income and foreign exchange
  • Collaborate with traders and portfolio managers directly in the tool – no more fragmented email chains
  • Create best execution compliance reports for Rule 206(4)-7 annual testing

TradeSentry is secure, cloud-based and backed by years of Ascendant experience in the field.

Tackle your trading compliance challenge systematically with TradeSentry by scheduling a demo today.

About Ascendant Services

Ascendant’s experienced consultants can review your firm’s best execution policies and procedures as part of an annual review engagement, assisting you in identifying any gaps or material risks.

For more information, contact info@ascendantcompliance.com or call (860) 435–2255.


Post written by Brian DeDonato & Kelley Merwin

Related Content

Latest Content

When Policies, Procedures and Testing Protocols Aren’t Enough…

The Compliance Program Rule continues to be a powerful tool for SEC enforcement, recently used by the SEC to address trading away in wrap accounts, misappropriation of retail client assets, and the misuse of an omnibus account. Advisory firms had written policies and procedures and testing protocols, but they were not good enough; are yours? … Continued

The Compliance Professionals Guide to Effective Trade Desk Monitoring

Global regulators continue to enhance their ability to monitor the activities of market participants through a combination of new rules, filing requirements, and upgrades to surveillance technologies. As a result, many market participants, including both buy-and sell-side firms, need to re-assess how they currently monitor the trading desk, and whether new policies and procedures are … Continued

How Do You Supervise for SEC Pay-to-Play Violations?

If you wanted more information about the contours of the SEC’s Pay-to-Play Rule, or how the SEC may enforce it, three recent Settlement Orders against large investment advisers for “over de minimis” political contributions provide some insight regarding one of the prohibitions: Contributions by Covered Associates to certain Government Officials over the specified Exception amount (capitalized words are terms in the … Continued

Do your Fund Documents Clearly Disclose Receipt of Accelerated Monitoring Fees?

Somewhat more reminiscent of the broken-windows enforcement era, two affiliated private equity advisers managing billions settled with the SEC on charges that they failed to make pre-commitment disclosures in fund governing documents related to accelerated fees received from portfolio companies. Interestingly, according to the Settlement Order, the advisers had made some disclosures in fund documents … Continued

The Cost of Compliance: Understanding and Leveraging Resources

For compliance officers, obtaining the necessary tools and resources to build an effective compliance program can be costly and difficult to implement. How do you distinguish the best in class, the most cost-efficient and effective for use in your program? In this ComplianceCast, speakers David Porteous of Faegre Baker Daniels and Korrine Kohm of Ascendant … Continued

Mailing List

Subscribe to the Ascendant Compliance email list for the latest compliance resources, conferences, ComplianceCasts™, and more.

Loading form...

Contact Us

Ascendant works together with clients to identify and assess critical needs through customized plans. If you need assistance with compliance functions, regulatory services, cybersecurity or technology tools, we’d love to speak with you.